Dogs experience emotional contagion from the smell of human stress, leading them to make more pessimistic choices, new research finds. The University of Bristol-led study, published in Scientific Reports on 22 July, is the first to test how human stress odours affect dogs’ learning and emotional state.
Evidence in humans suggests that the smell of a stressed person subconsciously affects the emotions and choices made by others around them. Bristol Veterinary School researchers wanted to find out whether dogs also experience changes in their learning and emotional state in response to human stress or relaxation odours.
The team used a test of optimism or pessimism in animals, based on the finding that optimistic or pessimistic choices by people indicate positive or negative emotions, respectively.
The researchers recruited 18 dog-owner partnerships to take part in a series of trials with different human smells present. During the trials, dogs were trained that when a food bowl was placed in one location, it contained a treat, but when placed in another location, it was empty. Once a dog learned the difference between these bowl locations, they were faster to approach the location with a treat than the empty location. Researchers then tested how quickly the dog would approach new, ambiguous bowl locations positioned between the original two.
A quick approach reflected optimism about food being present in these ambiguous locations – a marker of a positive emotional state – while a slow approach indicated pessimism and negative emotion. These trials were repeated while each dog was exposed to either no odour or the odours of sweat and breath samples from humans in either a stressed (arithmetic test) or relaxed (listening to soundscapes) state.
Researchers discovered that the stress smell made dogs slower to approach the ambiguous bowl location nearest the trained location of the empty bowl. An effect that was not seen with the relaxed smell. These findings suggest that the stress smell may have increased the dogs’ expectations that this new location contained no food, similar to the nearby empty bowl location.
Researchers suggest this pessimistic response reflects a negative emotional state and could possibly be a way for the dog to conserve energy and avoid disappointment.
The team also found that dogs continued to improve their learning about the presence or absence of food in the two trained bowl locations and that they improved faster when the stress smell was present.
Dr Nicola Rooney, senior lecturer in Wildlife and Conservation at Bristol Veterinary School and the paper’s lead author, explained: “Understanding how human stress affects dogs’ well-being is an important consideration for dogs in kennels and when training companion dogs and dogs for working roles such as assistance dogs.
“Dog owners know how attuned their pets are to their emotions, but here we show that even the odour of a stressed, unfamiliar human affects a dog’s emotional state, perception of rewards, and ability to learn. Working dog handlers often describe stress travelling down the lead, but we’ve also shown it can also travel through the air.”
Dr Zoe Parr-Cortes, PhD student at Bristol Veterinary School and primary author and researcher on the project expressed her thanks to everyone involved in the study, especially all the participants and dog owners who took part in the research.